Aryan Shah vs Leo Raquillet Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• When comparing second serve performance in the last six months, Shah edges out Raquillet slightly, winning 44.39% of points compared to Raquillet's 43.42%. Could this give Shah an advantage? Yes, albeit a small one.
• In return games, Raquillet has a minor lead over Shah on their opponent's second serves, securing 46.19% of points versus Shah’s 46.13%. However, Raquillet displays a more noticeable advantage on first serve returns, capturing 30.74% of points compared to Shah’s 25.38%.
• When under pressure, breakpoints are crucial. Raquillet has saved 51.91% of breakpoints recently, outperforming Shah's 48.91% save rate.
• Looking at overall match success over the past year, Shah holds a higher win percentage of 62.12% compared to Raquillet's 58.49%. Does this indicate Shah is the more consistent performer? It certainly suggests so.
• Surface preferences differ: Raquillet excels on Clay with a 54% win rate, while Shah shows superior performance on Indoor Hard surfaces with a 67% win rate.
• Both players have predominantly competed in Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K tournaments. Shah has a slightly better win percentage, achieving 64.44% compared to Raquillet’s 62.79%.
• Regarding opponent quality, Raquillet has faced tougher competition, with opponents averaging a rank of 386.51 compared to Shah's 413.2. Can facing stronger opponents give Raquillet an edge? Potentially, yes.
• In matches that progress to a deciding set, Raquillet wins 67% of them, surpassing Shah's 63% success rate.
• Raquillet displays superior breakpoint conversion capabilities, converting 39.78% of opportunities, whereas Shah converts 31.68%.

Editorial Prediction (September 14, 2025, UTC):

Assessing recent performance statistics, Shah holds a slight edge over Raquillet in second serve performance and has exhibited higher overall match success in the past year. While this suggests Shah's consistency, Raquillet's advantages in first serve return and onsite pressure indicate strong competitiveness.

Raquillet's superior matchup against higher-ranked opponents, coupled with his advantage in high-pressure breakpoint situations, could be decisive. Moreover, Raquillet's better performance in deciding sets may provide a key edge should the match extend.

Considering surface strengths, the match's location may play a significant role, supporting either player's proclivities. However, Raquillet's adeptness in converting breakpoints slightly tips the balance in his favor.

Based on the evaluated data, Raquillet emerges as the probable winner in this upcoming encounter, owing to his marginally superior performance under critical match conditions.